What does God’s love depend on? Criticism of John L. Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument = Na czym polega miłość Boga? Krytyka argumentu z ukrytości Johna L. Schellenberga
The first premise of Schellenberg’s hiddenness argument is that God, as a perfect being, is obliged to establish a relationship of love with each of his personal creatures. It seems, however, that the attribute of God’s love cannot be understood in exactly the same way as it relates to love between...
Subtitles: | Na czym polega miłość Boga? Krytyka argumentu z ukrytości Johna L. Schellenberga |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | Polish |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze
2019
|
In: |
Przegla̜d religioznawczy
Year: 2019, Issue: 2/272 |
Further subjects: | B
Hiddenness Argument
B Attribute of God’s Love B John J. Schellenberg |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1851079602 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240328080724.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230627s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||pol c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)1851079602 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1851079602 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a pol | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1183935676 |0 (DE-627)1663407851 |4 aut |a Mordarski, Ryszard |d ca. 20./21. Jh. | |
109 | |a Mordarski, Ryszard ca. 20./21. Jh. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a What does God’s love depend on? Criticism of John L. Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument |b = Na czym polega miłość Boga? Krytyka argumentu z ukrytości Johna L. Schellenberga |
246 | 3 | 1 | |a Na czym polega miłość Boga? Krytyka argumentu z ukrytości Johna L. Schellenberga |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The first premise of Schellenberg’s hiddenness argument is that God, as a perfect being, is obliged to establish a relationship of love with each of his personal creatures. It seems, however, that the attribute of God’s love cannot be understood in exactly the same way as it relates to love between people. God’s transcendence presupposes that he is completely different from human beings. Therefore, one may think that there are some reasons for God’s hiddenness that do not interfere with His love. In addition, God’s silence must be distinguished from His hiddenness. In fact, silence does not reject the act of communication, but only points to other - more personal - forms. | ||
601 | |a Schellenberg, J. L. | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Attribute of God’s Love | |
650 | 4 | |a Hiddenness Argument | |
650 | 4 | |a John J. Schellenberg | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Przegla̜d religioznawczy |d Warszawa : Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze, 2004 |g (2019), 2/272 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1767752121 |w (DE-600)3091285-4 |x 2658-1531 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2019 |g number:2/272 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.ptr.edu.pl/index.php/ptr/article/view/82 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4343943844 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1851079602 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230627134334 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230627||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |