Reason and grief: C.S. Lewis’ apologetic arguments in the face of the loss. Part II. Grief = Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część II. Żałoba

The Part I discussed Lewis’s anti-naturalistic arguments from the existence of morality, reason, desires and numinous experiences. In Part II these arguments are contrasted with what Lewis wrote about God, faith and life after death in the period following the passing of his wife, a great loss for t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część II. Żałoba
Main Author: Bylica, Piotr (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Polish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze 2020
In: Przegla̜d religioznawczy
Year: 2020, Issue: 2/276
Further subjects:B Grief
B CHRISTIAN apologetics
B Christian theism
B Naturalism
B Reason
B Clive S. Lewis
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1851064567
003 DE-627
005 20230627114800.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230627s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||pol c
035 |a (DE-627)1851064567 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1851064567 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a pol 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bylica, Piotr  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Reason and grief: C.S. Lewis’ apologetic arguments in the face of the loss. Part II. Grief  |b  = Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część II. Żałoba 
246 3 1 |a Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część II. Żałoba 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Part I discussed Lewis’s anti-naturalistic arguments from the existence of morality, reason, desires and numinous experiences. In Part II these arguments are contrasted with what Lewis wrote about God, faith and life after death in the period following the passing of his wife, a great loss for the thinker. It is shown that Lewis’ case does not fit the model, where it is assumed that religious faith flourishes if the role of reason is being limited, or that various antinaturalistic claims are more likely to be accepted, if the reason is somehow "stifled". 
650 4 |a CHRISTIAN apologetics 
650 4 |a Christian theism 
650 4 |a Clive S. Lewis 
650 4 |a Grief 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a Reason 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Przegla̜d religioznawczy  |d Warszawa : Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze, 2004  |g (2020), 2/276  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1767752121  |w (DE-600)3091285-4  |x 2658-1531  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2020  |g number:2/276 
856 4 0 |u https://journal.ptr.edu.pl/index.php/ptr/article/view/152  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |j 2020  |e 2/276 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 434391349X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1851064567 
LOK |0 005 20230627113326 
LOK |0 008 230627||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL