Are Women Liable for Blood-Money Payment?: An Attempt to Modify a Ḥanafī Rule

Against the view that only men are liable for blood-money payment due for homicide, which goes back to pre-Islamic custom and was adopted by the Sharīʿa, by the fifth/eleventh century a new opinion appeared in Ḥanafī doctrine. According to this opinion, women who perpetrated a homicide were required...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Tsafrir, Nurit 1957- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2023
Dans: Hawwa
Année: 2023, Volume: 21, Numéro: 2, Pages: 192-211
Sujets non-standardisés:B Women
B Ḥanafī law
B Homicide
B blood-money payment
B Sharīʿa
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Against the view that only men are liable for blood-money payment due for homicide, which goes back to pre-Islamic custom and was adopted by the Sharīʿa, by the fifth/eleventh century a new opinion appeared in Ḥanafī doctrine. According to this opinion, women who perpetrated a homicide were required to pay a share of the blood money due. Examining the context of this opinion in Ḥanafī literature, I suggest that it reflects the jurists’ tendency to put more weight on the Islamic principle of individual responsibility, regardless of gender. I propose that this opinion developed among Persian Ḥanafīs in eastern Iran, and follow the path through which it was incorporated into Ḥanafī standard law. Finally, I estimate the extent to which this opinion did influence Ḥanafī doctrine.
ISSN:1569-2086
Contient:Enthalten in: Hawwa
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15692086-bja10029