An Argument for More, Not Less, Religion in Australian Politics
Liberals, and others, have conventionally maintained that religion-state separation is the best guarantee of religious freedom. Many have also argued that religion-state separation entails keeping religion out of politics. But trying to quarantine religion and politics from one another is often coun...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Equinox Publ.
2009
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the academic study of religion
Année: 2009, Volume: 22, Numéro: 3, Pages: 345-367 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Church and state
B Religion And Politics B Secularism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | Liberals, and others, have conventionally maintained that religion-state separation is the best guarantee of religious freedom. Many have also argued that religion-state separation entails keeping religion out of politics. But trying to quarantine religion and politics from one another is often counter-productive, keeping important questions off-limits. A more inclusive approach would be to treat religion as a normal part of political debate, open, like everything else, to public discussion and contestation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2047-7058 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the academic study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/arsr.v22i3.345 |