The Qurʾanic Word Rūḥ and Its Restricted Interpretations: An Analysis of Classical Tafsīr Tradition

The aim of this article is to uncover a fuller meaning of the qur’anic word rūḥ through a critical analysis of the classical tafsīr tradition, challenging the prevailing scholarly opinion that rūḥ must be interpreted through the lens of that tradition. I demonstrate that classical Muslim exegetes re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laffoon, Peter (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2023
In: Islam and Christian-Muslim relations
Year: 2023, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-88
Further subjects:B Exegesis
B Qur’an
B rūḥ
B Tafsīr
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1845102185
003 DE-627
005 20230511055510.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230511s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09596410.2022.2132349  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1845102185 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1845102185 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Laffoon, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Qurʾanic Word Rūḥ and Its Restricted Interpretations: An Analysis of Classical Tafsīr Tradition 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The aim of this article is to uncover a fuller meaning of the qur’anic word rūḥ through a critical analysis of the classical tafsīr tradition, challenging the prevailing scholarly opinion that rūḥ must be interpreted through the lens of that tradition. I demonstrate that classical Muslim exegetes restricted their interpretations of the word, saying that the rūḥ is either Gabriel, a super angel/metaphysical creature, a created soul or an inspiration from God, or else remaining silent and not offering any interpretation. They gave these interpretations even in cases where they were contradictory or implausible because other interpretations might have raised theological concerns rooted in the fear of conflating the rūḥ or Jesus with God. The rūḥ had to be interpreted as muḥdath (created) not qadīm (eternally existing), lest any implied anthropomorphic overtones might impinge upon God’s transcendence, and to avoid the theological implications of Jesus being rūḥ Allāh. This restriction on interpretation has substantially impacted later exegetes, philologists and Islamic scholars, obscuring the meaning of the qur’anic rūḥ. This article recommends a more critical reading of tafsīr in order uncover a fuller meaning of the qur’anic rūḥ. 
601 |a Interpretation 
650 4 |a Tafsīr 
650 4 |a Exegesis 
650 4 |a Qur’an 
650 4 |a rūḥ 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Islam and Christian-Muslim relations  |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1990  |g 34(2023), 1, Seite 53-88  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320634736  |w (DE-600)2024366-2  |w (DE-576)09466157X  |x 1469-9311  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2023  |g number:1  |g pages:53-88 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2132349  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 34  |j 2023  |e 1  |h 53-88 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4320433971 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1845102185 
LOK |0 005 20230511055510 
LOK |0 008 230511||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-05-10#318828DD41F15BFF7FDBDBB00365F85D8ABB1888 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL