Who Should Be the Subject of Global Governance?
The neo-liberal view of global governance holds that sovereign state-dominated global governance will undermine the fairness of the international community, and the social legitimacy of nationalism is insufficient. However, some scholars pointed out that in the global governance mechanism advocated...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
David Publishing Company
2019
|
| In: |
Cultural and religious studies
Jahr: 2019, Band: 7, Heft: 4, Seiten: 213-218 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Global Governance
B Neo-liberalism B state’s coordination |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The neo-liberal view of global governance holds that sovereign state-dominated global governance will undermine the fairness of the international community, and the social legitimacy of nationalism is insufficient. However, some scholars pointed out that in the global governance mechanism advocated by neo-liberalism and cosmopolitanism, the state role is absent and the subjects and fields of governance are highly overlapping and inefficient, resulting in the dilemma that global governance is more fair than efficient. This article holds that the implementation of effective global governance can draw lessons from the experience of China’s socialist market economy and form a state-coordinated diversified governance program. Through the coordination of the state and considering both the fairness and efficiency in the process of global governance, the effective combination of the two can be achieved on the subject of global governance. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2328-2177 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Cultural and religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17265/2328-2177/2019.04.004 |