“Muskets and Rainbows”: Why a Mormon Leader’s BYU Speech Failed, Metaphorically

The use of metaphors in religious rhetoric can be persuasive, inclusive, and edifying. They can also be belligerent, harmful, and divisive. This paper investigates the backlash against the use of a “muskets” metaphor in a recent speech by a prominent Mormon leader which targeted LGBTQ+ members, in t...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Hale, Adrian (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage 2023
Dans: Critical research on religion
Année: 2023, Volume: 11, Numéro: 1, Pages: 13-32
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B USA / Église mormone / Bibel / Métaphore / Discours / LGBT / Minorités sexuelles
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
CB Spiritualité chrétienne
KBQ Amérique du Nord
KDH Sectes d’origine chrétienne
NBE Anthropologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Metaphors
B Religion
B Mormon
B Identity
B LGBTQ+
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The use of metaphors in religious rhetoric can be persuasive, inclusive, and edifying. They can also be belligerent, harmful, and divisive. This paper investigates the backlash against the use of a “muskets” metaphor in a recent speech by a prominent Mormon leader which targeted LGBTQ+ members, in the wider context of a traditionally fraught relationship between the Church and its LGBTQ+ membership. This paper argues that the speech represents an act of authoritarianism, reliant upon the institutionally-situated power of a Church leader. Critics have interpreted the speech’s use of violent metaphor as an unwarranted attack on some of the most vulnerable members of the Mormon community, paradoxically at a time when the Church was seen as moving towards a more inclusive position in doctrine and policy.
ISSN:2050-3040
Contient:Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/20503032221148475