Heavenly writing and the authority of rewritten scripture: Reevaluating explicit references to the Pentateuch in Jubilees

Interpreters commonly designate two phrases in Jubilees, “the book of the first law” (6:22) and “the words of the law” (30:12), as explicit references to the already written Pentateuch that thus transparently acknowledge the historical context of its own production. However, these supposedly earthly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Klem, Matthew J. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Sage 2023
In: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Jahr: 2023, Band: 32, Heft: 3, Seiten: 285-299
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Bibel. Altes Testament. Apokryphen / Liber iubilaeorum / Bible. Pentateuch, Bibel. Pentateuch / Rewritten bible / tôrah
RelBib Classification:BH Judentum
HB Altes Testament
weitere Schlagwörter:B Apocalyptic
B liber iubilaeorum 30,12
B Sinai
B Heavenly Tablets
B Pseudepigraphy
B Rewritten Scripture
B Second Temple Judaism
B liber iubilaeorum 6,22
B Moses
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Interpreters commonly designate two phrases in Jubilees, “the book of the first law” (6:22) and “the words of the law” (30:12), as explicit references to the already written Pentateuch that thus transparently acknowledge the historical context of its own production. However, these supposedly earthly writings are penned by the angel, and interpreters identifying them as already existing Torah seem to equivocate about whether they belong to an earthly or heavenly corpus. Supplementing the work of David Lambert, this article argues that the phrases can be coherently construed as references to heavenly writing, the archetype based on which Moses writes Torah. They therefore harmonize with the putative context of Sinai revelation, rather than compromising it. And the resulting absence of any explicit reference to the Pentateuch can be comprehended in light of Jubilees’s strategies for claiming authority. Determining the referents of these two phrases is consequential for our understanding of Mosaic pseudepigraphy more broadly.
ISSN:1745-5286
Enthält:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/09518207221137068