Naturalism and the Categories “Science” and “Religion”: A Response to Josh Reeves
This article is a response to Josh Reeve's “A Defense of Science and Religion.” I begin with the disclaimer that this was not solely my project but a joint enterprise. A common commitment of participants was to make the disciplines of history and theology central to the discussion and explore w...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2023
|
| Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2023, Volume: 58, Numéro: 1, Pages: 98-108 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
natural philosophy
B Genealogy B Radical Orthodoxy B John Milbank B Secularization B Naturalism B Methodological Naturalism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This article is a response to Josh Reeve's “A Defense of Science and Religion.” I begin with the disclaimer that this was not solely my project but a joint enterprise. A common commitment of participants was to make the disciplines of history and theology central to the discussion and explore what new possibilities follows for the field of science and religion. I then address Reeves's two central concerns: first that I am too dismissive of the categories “science” and “religion.” In fact I have not advocated dispensing with these categories, but have insisted than we employ them critically and with a sense of their history. The second concern is that my position on naturalism seems to place me perilously close to advocates of ID or scientific creationism. I deny this, but point out that more work needs to be done, beyond simply invoking methodological naturalism, to clarify the differences between naturalistic and theological approaches to the world. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Référence: | Kommentar zu "A Defense of Science and Religion: Reflections on Peter Harrison's “After Science and Religion” Project (2023)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12865 |