Do Repentance and Change of Character Excuse Wrongdoing?

The conditions of legitimate attributions of responsibility have been perennially debated by philosophical, religious and legal scholars. Generally, the discussion tends to be dominantly focused on the responsibility of the wrongdoer. The moral standing of repented and reformed wrongdoers usually sl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Frimpong-Mansoh, Yaw A. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Common Ground Publishing 2012
In: The international journal of religion and spirituality in society
Jahr: 2012, Band: 2, Heft: 1, Seiten: 71-84
weitere Schlagwörter:B Punishment
B Forgiveness
B David Hume
B Restorative Justice
B Character
B Repentance
B Responsibility
B Retribution
B Revenge
B Excuse
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1840598042
003 DE-627
005 20230330144731.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230330s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v02i01/51196  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840598042 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840598042 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Frimpong-Mansoh, Yaw A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Do Repentance and Change of Character Excuse Wrongdoing? 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The conditions of legitimate attributions of responsibility have been perennially debated by philosophical, religious and legal scholars. Generally, the discussion tends to be dominantly focused on the responsibility of the wrongdoer. The moral standing of repented and reformed wrongdoers usually slips through the discussion. Is it morally legitimate to hold repented and reformed wrongdoers responsible for their past wrongdoing? Is failing to excuse repented and reformed wrongdoers of responsibility morally wrong? I engage in a theoretical examination of the concepts of repentance and character reform, and examine the extent to which they constitute legitimate grounds of excuse of wrongdoing. My central concern is not fundamentally about the possibility of false judgments in wrongdoing. Also, my main concern transcends the issue whether a wrongdoer deserves a humane treatment. Instead, I am ultimately concerned with the deeper issue whether we owe a moral obligation towards repented and reformed offenders. I approach the discussion normatively from the context of David Hume’s discussion of excuse conditions of wrongdoing, both in his Treatise and Enquiries. Hume stopped short of stating clearly whether an excuse consideration towards a repented and changed wrongdoer is a moral obligation. Using Hume’s account as a stepping stone, I defend a stronger claim that, in matters of justice and fairness, excusing a repented and changed wrongdoer is a moral imperative. I distinguish excuse from forgiveness, and argue that unlike the latter, excuse in the contexts of repentance and change of character is an obligatory principle of justice but not a sentiment of mercy and compassion reducible to a personal voluntary decision or choice. The discussion concludes with an examination of implications for social justice the ideas of repentance and excuse discussed in this paper. 
650 4 |a Character 
650 4 |a David Hume 
650 4 |a Excuse 
650 4 |a Forgiveness 
650 4 |a Punishment 
650 4 |a Repentance 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a Restorative Justice 
650 4 |a Retribution 
650 4 |a Revenge 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The international journal of religion and spirituality in society  |d Champaign, Ill. : Common Ground Publishing, 2011  |g 2(2012), 1, Seite 71-84  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)683370324  |w (DE-600)2646017-8  |w (DE-576)485196581  |x 2154-8641  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:2  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:71-84 
856 4 0 |u https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/do-repentance-and-change-of-character-excuse-wrongdoing  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v02i01/51196  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 2  |j 2012  |e 1  |h 71-84 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4300013691 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840598042 
LOK |0 005 20230330144731 
LOK |0 008 230330||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL