William James and the (Non) Replication Crisis in Psychology: Conjectures and Controversy in the Psychology of Religion

The question of whether psychology ought to be or is a science remains an open issue for both historical and philosophical reasons. Recent proposals for a theistic psychology clash most strongly with advocates of psychological science which are largely restricted to an epistemological naturalism. Th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research in the social scientific study of religion
Main Author: Hood, Ralph W. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2022
In: Research in the social scientific study of religion
Further subjects:B History of religion studies
B Religious sociology
B Social sciences
B Religionspsycholigie
B Religionswissenschaften
B Religion & Gesellschaft
B Vergleichende Religionswissenschaft & Religionswissenschaft
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1840030607
003 DE-627
005 20230324120329.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230324s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/9789004505315_021  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840030607 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840030607 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hood, Ralph W.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a William James and the (Non) Replication Crisis in Psychology: Conjectures and Controversy in the Psychology of Religion 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The question of whether psychology ought to be or is a science remains an open issue for both historical and philosophical reasons. Recent proposals for a theistic psychology clash most strongly with advocates of psychological science which are largely restricted to an epistemological naturalism. Theistic psychologies transcend epistemological naturalism and introduce non-material ontological considerations into psychology as a possible competing paradigm in which spiritual realities co-exist with the physical and are explicitly acknowledged. The history of these two competing paradigms characterizes the history of Division 36 of the APA and remain live options. Efforts to establish psychology as a natural science, divorced from philosophy can be traced to William James who treated psychology as if it were a natural science in his Principles of Psychology while cognizant of serious philosophical conundrums that led him to abandon a strict epistemological naturalism in his study of religion. In James’ Variety of Religious Experience advocates of theistic psychology have a model for an alternative to the preferred naturalist paradigm in the American study of religion and spirituality. James’ suggestions for an alternative paradigm based upon empirical studies that evaluate secular and theistic psychologies within their cultural contexts can provide the realization of a conversation between advocates of what otherwise are largely philosophically incommensurate paradigms for psychology as a unique discipline. 
601 |a Williams, A. N. 
601 |a Psychologie 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Religion & Gesellschaft 
650 4 |a Religionsgeschichte 
650 4 |a Religionspsycholigie 
650 4 |a Religionssoziologie 
650 4 |a Religionswissenschaften 
650 4 |a Sozialwissenschaften 
650 4 |a Vergleichende Religionswissenschaft & Religionswissenschaft 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Research in the social scientific study of religion  |d Leiden : Brill, 2007  |g 32(2022), Seite 373-398  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)894586033  |w (DE-600)2901099-8  |w (DE-576)491303807  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2022  |g pages:373-398 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/display/book/9789004505315/BP000031.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004505315_021  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 32  |j 2022  |h 373-398 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4296767135 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840030607 
LOK |0 005 20230324120329 
LOK |0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a History of religion studies,History of religion,History of religion,Religious sociology,Sociology of religion,Religion,Religion and sociology,Social sciences,Social theory 
STB 0 0 |a Histoire des religions,Histoire religieuse,Sciences sociales,Sociologie des religions,Sociologie religieuse 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencias sociales,Historia de la religión,Historia de la religión,Sociología de la religión 
STD 0 0 |a Scienze sociali,Sociologia della religione,Storia delle religioni,Storia delle religioni 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教史,宗教,宗教社会学,社会科学 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教史,宗教,宗教社會學,社會科學 
STG 0 0 |a Ciências sociais,História da religião,História da religião,Sociologia da religião 
STH 0 0 |a История религии (дисциплина),История религии,Общественные науки,Социология религии 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκευτική Ιστορία (μάθημα),Θρησκευτική Ιστορία,Κοινωνικές επιστήμες,Κοινωνιολογία της θρησκείας 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion , Gesellschaftswissenschaften,Sozialwissenschaft