On the origins of the Great Fuxian monastery 大福先寺 in Luoyang
The Great Fuxian Monastery (Da Fuxian si 大福先寺) held a highly favored political and religious position in Luoyang, one of the twin capitals of the Tang and interregnum Zhou dynasties. The monastery’s early rise to significance is most intimately associated with Wu Zhao, the only woman in Chinese hist...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2015
|
Dans: |
Studies in Chinese Religions
Année: 2015, Volume: 1, Numéro: 1, Pages: 46-69 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Kloster Da Fuxian si Luoyang
/ Tang Wu Hou, China, Kaiserin 624-705
/ Coopération internationale
/ Littérature bouddhiste
/ Traduction
/ Chinois
/ Histoire 675-705
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions AG Vie religieuse BL Bouddhisme KBM Asie KCA Monachisme; ordres religieux TE Moyen Âge |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Yijing
B Da Fuxian si B Luoyang B Zhou dynasty B Taiyuan si B Tang Dynasty B Wu Zhao |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Résumé: | The Great Fuxian Monastery (Da Fuxian si 大福先寺) held a highly favored political and religious position in Luoyang, one of the twin capitals of the Tang and interregnum Zhou dynasties. The monastery’s early rise to significance is most intimately associated with Wu Zhao, the only woman in Chinese history to rule in her own right. Under her patronage, Da Fuxian si hosted several translation projects, overseen by eminent monks such as Divākara, Yijing, and Bodhiruci. Further, a committee headed by the monk Huaiyi - and including several eminent monks affiliated with the Da Fuxian si (Faming, Chuyi, and Huiyan) - compiled a piece of propagandist Buddhist literature justifying Wu Zhao’s rule. Yet, due in part to its relationship with the controversial female ruler, the monastery is intriguingly underrepresented in the historical records and, as a result, has yet to be fully explored in scholarship. Antonino Forte mends this oversight, providing a more complete history of the monastery by reconstructing its integral first thirty years in two parts: 1) from its establishment in 675 to the dissolution of the Tang in 690; and 2) the fifteen years of the successive Zhou dynasty, until the restoration of the Tang in 705. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2372-9996 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Studies in Chinese Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/23729988.2015.1028202 |