Accommodation of ash scattering in contemporary Norwegian governance of death and religion/worldview

With the analysis of the scattering ashes in a Norwegian context as its point of departure, the article sets out to explore ash scattering and how it relates to the governance of deathscape and religion/worldview in the public space. Referring to ethnographic study, the focus is on the bereaved and...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Høeg, Ida Marie (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: [publisher not identified] 2023
Dans: Approaching religion
Année: 2023, Volume: 13, Numéro: 1, Pages: 54-72
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Norwegen / Cendre / Mort / Sépulture dans la nature / Gouvernance / Christianisme / Vision du monde / Espace public
RelBib Classification:CB Spiritualité chrétienne
CG Christianisme et politique
CH Christianisme et société
KBE Scandinavie
XA Droit
Sujets non-standardisés:B Religious Diversity
B ash disposal
B Public Space
B religion in Norway
B Gouvernance
B Religion
B ash scattering
B Worldview
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:With the analysis of the scattering ashes in a Norwegian context as its point of departure, the article sets out to explore ash scattering and how it relates to the governance of deathscape and religion/worldview in the public space. Referring to ethnographic study, the focus is on the bereaved and the deceased in the governance process for ash scattering and on critically rethinking the governance of ash scattering from the private actors’ experiences. I argue that ash scattering is in the process of establishing a spatial ritual institution, deregulated vis-à-vis organized religion/worldview, which, on the one hand, opens up the possibility for the privatization of death and provides ideals of individuality, privacy and discretion, and, on the other hand, this takes place paradoxically not in private but rather within public space.
ISSN:1799-3121
Contient:Enthalten in: Approaching religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.30664/ar.121699