Regime or Revolution? The Dilemma of Syria’s Religious Institutions: The Example of the Fatih Institute
The Sunni ‘ulama of Syria did not respond to the 2011 revolution in a unified fashion. Whereas top scholars gave full support to initial protests, others aligned themselves with the regime. Quietism was the preferred choice of a third group. Taking the Fatih Institute as a case study, this paper pre...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2020
|
| In: |
Politics, religion & ideology
Jahr: 2020, Band: 21, Heft: 2, Seiten: 232-250 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Obedience
B Regime B Syrian Revolution B quietists B fitna B ruler B ‘ulama B The Fatih |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The Sunni ‘ulama of Syria did not respond to the 2011 revolution in a unified fashion. Whereas top scholars gave full support to initial protests, others aligned themselves with the regime. Quietism was the preferred choice of a third group. Taking the Fatih Institute as a case study, this paper presents the differing positions of the Faith scholars with their pronounced rationales. Adopting textual and contextual analysis, the paper examines these views on the basis of Islamic sources on one hand and the realistic situation of the Syrian prolonged crisis on the other hand. The paper concludes that the Syrian regime was able to exploit religious institutions to propagate its narrative of events. Also, co-opted scholars widely vary in their acquiescence and response to the regime’s demand. More impotently, with the absence of the essentially geo-political, and social considerations, the pro-revolution camp failed to consider the present vs. the expected harm, which resulted in massive bloodshed and major upheaval in the Syrian society as a whole. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2156-7697 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Politics, religion & ideology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21567689.2020.1763317 |