Religion and dual-process cognition: a continuum of styles or distinct types?

Over the last two decades, various lines of research within cognitive science and social psychology have converged to create dual-process theory. The received view of this theory suggests two distinct cognitive processes: one is intuitive and the other reflective. But the defining features of these...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morgan, Jonathan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2016
In: Religion, brain & behavior
Year: 2016, Volume: 6, Issue: 2, Pages: 112-129
Further subjects:B analytical thought
B Cognitive styles
B dual-process
B religious cognition
B intuitive thought
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837945950
003 DE-627
005 20230302122130.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230302s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/2153599X.2014.966315  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837945950 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837945950 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Morgan, Jonathan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Morgan, Jonathan  |a Morgan, Jonathan J. 
245 1 0 |a Religion and dual-process cognition: a continuum of styles or distinct types? 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Over the last two decades, various lines of research within cognitive science and social psychology have converged to create dual-process theory. The received view of this theory suggests two distinct cognitive processes: one is intuitive and the other reflective. But the defining features of these two types have been called into question by recent critiques. In response, new constraints have refined the distinctive features of each type, and distinguished between distinct types of processes and differing modes of the same type. This reformulation of dual-process theory bears upon the cognitive science of religion by reorganizing our understanding of religious cognition in relation to these two types of processes. Religious belief has been traditionally associated with type 1, intuitive, processes. This paper reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on dual-process theory and religion in order to suggest that while these basic intuitive processes may support religious beliefs, we must also expand our view to understand belief in relation to varying cognitive modes. These modes exist on a continuum, and are properly understood as type 2, reflective, processes. Thus they present a more nuanced and complex framework for understanding the relationship between varying types of religious belief and cognitive styles. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a analytical thought 
650 4 |a Cognitive styles 
650 4 |a dual-process 
650 4 |a intuitive thought 
650 4 |a religious cognition 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion, brain & behavior  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, 2011  |g 6(2016), 2, Seite 112-129  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)666852502  |w (DE-600)2624106-7  |w (DE-576)457642572  |x 2153-5981  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2016  |g number:2  |g pages:112-129 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.966315  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 6  |j 2016  |e 2  |h 112-129 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4282529989 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837945950 
LOK |0 005 20230302122130 
LOK |0 008 230302||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL