Sayyid Quṭb’s critique of fiqh
Sayyid Quṭb’s views on fiqh (jurisprudence) have been the subject of significant critique. This paper seeks to understand the bases of such criticisms through a qualitative content analysis of his exegesis and other writings. We begin with a brief survey of the views of scholars who have spoken in f...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2014
|
| In: |
Intellectual discourse
Jahr: 2014, Band: 22, Heft: 2 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Sayyid Quṭb
B Dynamic jurisprudence B Jihād B Muslim jurists B Fiqh |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Sayyid Quṭb’s views on fiqh (jurisprudence) have been the subject of significant critique. This paper seeks to understand the bases of such criticisms through a qualitative content analysis of his exegesis and other writings. We begin with a brief survey of the views of scholars who have spoken in favour of and against him, followed by a brief biographic profile of Quṭb. This paper focuses on Quṭb’s critique of three key issues. First, the terms "Fiqh al-Awrāq" (jurisprudence of papers) and "Fiqh al-Ḥarakah" (dynamic jurisprudence) as employed during his discourse on fiqh are analysed. Second, his interpretation of the concept of "Dār al-Islām" (Land of Islam) and "Dār al-Ḥarb" (Hostile Land) that led to criticisms by jurists are analysed through a comparison with the views of other jurists. Third, his discourse on the application of the concept of al-marḥaliyyah (stages) in jihād, that caused misunderstandings among jurists, is analysed in the context of a response to the need for developing dynamic jurisprudence for contemporary communities. The study endeavours to dispel ambiguities and present an objective account of Quṭb’s discourse on fiqh. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2289-5639 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Intellectual discourse
|