Objectivity and the Scientific Study of Religion

The concern for and the debate on "objectivity" in the scientific study of religions led scholars to advocate two major approaches known as "History of Religion" and "Phenomenology of Religion." Both approaches are claimed to be "descriptive" and "value-f...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Thoha, Anis Malik (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: 2009
Dans: Intellectual discourse
Année: 2009, Volume: 17, Numéro: 1
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837851972
003 DE-627
005 20230301153604.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1837851972 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837851972 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Thoha, Anis Malik  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Thoha, Anis Malik  |a Anis Malik Thoha 
245 1 0 |a Objectivity and the Scientific Study of Religion 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The concern for and the debate on "objectivity" in the scientific study of religions led scholars to advocate two major approaches known as "History of Religion" and "Phenomenology of Religion." Both approaches are claimed to be "descriptive" and "value-free" as they stringently enforce the principle of epochê or distanciation to ensure objectivity. However, there are scholars who argue that objectivity (be it "descriptive" or "value-free") is ontologically questionable and epistemologically impossible. It is a selfdefeating concept and a myth. They argue that objectivity is principally and directly concerned with "the object" under investigation regardless of the types of approach used. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Intellectual discourse  |d Kuala Lumpur, 2005  |g 17(2009), 1  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)634379801  |w (DE-600)2570657-3  |w (DE-576)339263164  |x 2289-5639  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2009  |g number:1 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/id/article/view/7  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 17  |j 2009  |e 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4282246618 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837851972 
LOK |0 005 20230301153604 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL