THE CRY OF THE EARTH: Religious Perspectives

The unique position of the human species lies in the contested fact that only human beings contributed to climate change and the certain fact that only they are capable of bringing positive changes. It is not only a matter of ‘can’ but also about responsibility. To this effect, only human beings can...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nandhikkara, Jose (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Dharmaram College 2022
In: Journal of Dharma
Year: 2022, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 135-140
Further subjects:B Laudato Si
B Global Agenda 2030
B homo custos
B economics of more
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837817065
003 DE-627
005 20230301112257.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1837817065 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837817065 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Nandhikkara, Jose  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Nandhikkara, Jose  |a Jose Nandhikkara 
245 1 4 |a THE CRY OF THE EARTH: Religious Perspectives 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The unique position of the human species lies in the contested fact that only human beings contributed to climate change and the certain fact that only they are capable of bringing positive changes. It is not only a matter of ‘can’ but also about responsibility. To this effect, only human beings can articulate an ethics of climate change and undertake obligations to act accordingly. As rational beings, we know that we are part of the problem; as moral beings, we should take responsibility for our common home and be part of the solutions. It is, therefore, a moral imperative and religious responsibility that we develop an integral ecology, bringing together all the fields of knowledge, economic, and political powers protecting and promoting the integrity of creation as an antidote to the omnipresent technocratic economic paradigm with the ‘use and throw away’ culture driven by a market economy and short-term electoral goals of politics. The economics of more is detrimental to the well-being of the Earth and the earthlings, including human beings. As moral agents, we can no longer treat the planet as a source of our consumeristic pleasure and sink for the waste we make through our unsustainable living. From a religious point of view, human beings are caretakers of the Earth and all who are living in this common home in collaboration and solidarity with all. We are responsible to God, fellow human beings and the creation. Our lives are rooted in nature, extended to the community, and guided by and oriented to God. 
650 4 |a Global Agenda 2030 
650 4 |a Laudato Si 
650 4 |a economics of more 
650 4 |a homo custos 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Dharma  |d Bengaluru : Dharmaram College, 1975  |g 47(2022), 2, Seite 135-140  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1765453895  |w (DE-600)3078855-9  |x 0253-7222  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:47  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:135-140 
856 4 0 |u http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/3824  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 47  |j 2022  |e 2  |h 135-140 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4281989749 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837817065 
LOK |0 005 20230301112257 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL