METAPHOR IN THE LANGUAGE OF RELIGION

The language of religion has been studied from different perspectives by theologians. philosophers, literary critics and linguists. Scholars from these diverse disciplines have focussed on different issues related to the language of religion. Philosophers' primary interest lies in the questions...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Pandaripande, Rajeshwari (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Dharmaram College 1990
Dans: Journal of Dharma
Année: 1990, Volume: 15, Numéro: 3, Pages: 185-204
Sujets non-standardisés:B Linguistic Structure
B Question of
B Myth
B Metaphor: A Point of Inquiry
B and 'Transcendent Reality
B Metaphor
B Metaphor as Ritualistic Symbol
B Sentence
B Metaphor: Definition
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:The language of religion has been studied from different perspectives by theologians. philosophers, literary critics and linguists. Scholars from these diverse disciplines have focussed on different issues related to the language of religion. Philosophers' primary interest lies in the questions related to the contents while linguists are primarily interested in analyzing the 101m of the language of religion. Thus philosophers such as Ayer, Carnap and Wittgenstein discuss questions such as (a) what kind of reality does language of religion depict, and (b) is language capable of expressing religious contents? and (c) how does language express religion (symbolically, or analogically?), etc. On the other hand linguists such as Ferguson," Rabin s and Samarin" are primarily interested in identifying formal features (phonetic, phonological, syntactic. etc.) which define the 'register' of the language of religion.
ISSN:0253-7222
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of Dharma