Why teach doctrine? A response to Dan Moulin’s ‘Challenging Christianity: Leo Tolstoy and religious education’ in Journal of Beliefs and Values, Vol. 30, No. 2, August 2009
In response to the article by Dan Moulin it is argued that the representation of Christianity in British religious education relies on central beliefs and practices that are widely shared. In contrast to Moulin we consider that the teaching of doctrine is important in order to prevent serious misund...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2010
|
| In: |
Journal of beliefs and values
Year: 2010, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 333-342 |
| Further subjects: | B
Openness
B Doctrine B Religious Education B Christianity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1837733163 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230228141001.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13617672.2010.521010 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1837733163 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1837733163 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Thompson, Penny |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Thompson, Penny | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why teach doctrine? A response to Dan Moulin’s ‘Challenging Christianity: Leo Tolstoy and religious education’ in Journal of Beliefs and Values, Vol. 30, No. 2, August 2009 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In response to the article by Dan Moulin it is argued that the representation of Christianity in British religious education relies on central beliefs and practices that are widely shared. In contrast to Moulin we consider that the teaching of doctrine is important in order to prevent serious misunderstanding of Christianity. Focussing on a sociological approach can undermine the importance of taking truth‐claims seriously as requiring real reflection. We argue that doctrine should not be thought of, or taught, as something rigid and restricting but rather inviting an on‐going re‐thinking and re‐application. Thus doctrines can be held confidently while remaining open to, and benefiting from, criticism. We finish by asking what can realistically be expected of teachers. | ||
| 601 | |a doctrina | ||
| 601 | |a Challenger | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Christianity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Doctrine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Openness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Education | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Watson, Brenda |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of beliefs and values |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1980 |g 31(2010), 3, Seite 333-342 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320634914 |w (DE-600)2024386-8 |w (DE-576)094752656 |x 1469-9362 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2010 |g number:3 |g pages:333-342 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2010.521010 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 31 |j 2010 |e 3 |h 333-342 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4277751180 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1837733163 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230228141001 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230228||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||