Religion as Politics not Law: the Religion Clauses in the Australian Constitution

The Australian Constitution provides for the protection of religious freedom and prohibits establishment in very similar terms to the United States Constitution. Yet while Australian judges have often stated the importance of religious freedom in a democratic state and have defined religion in a bro...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religion, state & society
Main Author: Evans, Carolyn (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2008
In: Religion, state & society
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837607052
003 DE-627
005 20230227151958.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230227s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09637490802260369  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837607052 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837607052 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Evans, Carolyn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Evans, Carolyn 
245 1 0 |a Religion as Politics not Law: the Religion Clauses in the Australian Constitution 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Australian Constitution provides for the protection of religious freedom and prohibits establishment in very similar terms to the United States Constitution. Yet while Australian judges have often stated the importance of religious freedom in a democratic state and have defined religion in a broad, culturally sensitive way, they have taken a narrow approach to the scope of religious freedom and to the meaning of establishment. The end result is that the courts have played very little role in determining the boundaries of acceptable government or legislative behaviour in the regulation of religion. Instead, the key decisions have been left to the political branches of government, which have been given a broad scope of power to engage in all but the most direct and egregious breaches of religious freedom. This article begins with an overview of the history of the drafting of the religion clauses of the Australian Constitution and then gives a detailed analysis of the way in which those clauses have been interpreted by the High Court. It concludes that the approach of the High Court in interpreting the religion clauses narrowly, as a constraint on government power rather than a right, has limited the capacity of the Court to participate meaningfully in the key legal questions around religious freedom. While this approach might have been workable in the past, the growing complexity of regulating religion means that the courts need to be able to develop more sophisticated legal approaches to questions of religious freedom. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion, state & society  |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1992  |g 36(2008), 3, Seite 283-302  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270928073  |w (DE-600)1478007-0  |w (DE-576)097188581  |x 1465-3974  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2008  |g number:3  |g pages:283-302 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09637490802260369  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 36  |j 2008  |e 3  |h 283-302 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4277344771 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837607052 
LOK |0 005 20230227151958 
LOK |0 008 230227||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL