Can Heaven Justify Horrendous Moral Evils? A Postmortem Autopsy

James Sterba has recently constructed a new and compelling logical problem of evil that rejects Plantinga’s free-will defense and employs the concept of significant freedom and the Pauline Principle to demonstrate an incompatibility between the existence of horrendous evil and the God of classical m...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Lancaster-Thomas, Asha (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: MDPI 2023
Dans: Religions
Année: 2023, Volume: 14, Numéro: 3
Sujets non-standardisés:B James Sterba
B Free Will
B Theodicy
B doctrine of heaven
B problem of evil
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1837481865
003 DE-627
005 20230226012538.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230225s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel14030296  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837481865 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837481865 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1218736526  |0 (DE-627)1734309261  |4 aut  |a Lancaster-Thomas, Asha 
109 |a Lancaster-Thomas, Asha  |a Thomas, Ascha Lancaster- 
245 1 0 |a Can Heaven Justify Horrendous Moral Evils? A Postmortem Autopsy 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a James Sterba has recently constructed a new and compelling logical problem of evil that rejects Plantinga’s free-will defense and employs the concept of significant freedom and the Pauline Principle to demonstrate an incompatibility between the existence of horrendous evil and the God of classical monotheism. In response, Jerry L. Walls, among others, has claimed that the doctrine of heaven can explain why God is justified in permitting horrendous evils in the world—an argument known as the afterlife theodicy. In this article, I explore this line of defense against Sterba’s logical problem of evil. I suggest that if the afterlife theodicy is to be effective, it must accept non-speciesist, strong universalism; deny or explicate divinely informed prior consent; reject an elective model of forgiveness; discard postmortem libertarian free will; and explain why God values libertarian free will in earthly life but not in the afterlife. 
601 |a Autopsie 
650 4 |a Free Will 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
650 4 |a doctrine of heaven 
650 4 |a James Sterba 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 14(2023), 3, Artikel-ID 296  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g elocationid:296 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/3/296/pdf?version=1677046564  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030296  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/3/296  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 14  |j 2023  |e 3  |i 296 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4276372429 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837481865 
LOK |0 005 20230225052539 
LOK |0 008 230225||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-02-22#C02AC14671559CC83673C6CB4FAB27FF68DF0B19 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL