Capable or Incapable? Disability and Justification in Martha Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach
This article evaluates Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach for its treatment of disability and philosophical grounding. A summary of Nussbaum’s claims on how her theory includes people with disabilities is followed by Eva Kittay’s demonstration that in Nussbaum’s approach exclusion results from...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2020
|
| In: |
Religious studies and theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 177-192 |
| Further subjects: | B
Martha Nussbaum
B Capabilities Approach B disability theory B Jean Porter B Thomas Aquinas B Eva Kittay |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1837303649 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230224094345.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230222s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/rsth.42125 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1837303649 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1837303649 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1075937779 |0 (DE-627)83404448X |0 (DE-576)444758755 |4 aut |a Buttrey, Michael | |
| 109 | |a Buttrey, Michael | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Capable or Incapable? Disability and Justification in Martha Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article evaluates Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach for its treatment of disability and philosophical grounding. A summary of Nussbaum’s claims on how her theory includes people with disabilities is followed by Eva Kittay’s demonstration that in Nussbaum’s approach exclusion results from the ambiguous role of human dignity. The argument then shows that Jean Porter’s appeals to virtue and human nature provide stronger philosophical grounding for making judgments about human flourishing than Nussbaum’s non-metaphysical liberalism, insufficient to account for her theory of capabilities. While Porter’s account of human nature does not escape Shane Clifton and Hans Reinders’ concerns about the exclusion of people with disabilities from the human ideal, her and John Berkman’s recovery of Thomistic ideas of infused virtue and grace do provide a more inclusive concept of the human telos. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Eva Kittay | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jean Porter | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Martha Nussbaum | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thomas Aquinas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Capabilities Approach | |
| 650 | 4 | |a disability theory | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies and theology |d London : Equinox Publ., 2006 |g 39(2020), 2, Seite 177-192 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543310442 |w (DE-600)2385398-0 |w (DE-576)271361964 |x 1747-5414 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g pages:177-192 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.42125 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.equinoxpub.com/RST/article/view/19020 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 39 |j 2020 |e 2 |h 177-192 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4275577329 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1837303649 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230222120737 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230222||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||