Bioethics after Posthumanism: Natural Law, Communicative Action and the Problem of Self-Design
Three recent books by prominent social and political theorists (Francis Fukuyama, Gregory Stock and Jürgen Habermas) have engaged with the impact of biotechnology on our very concepts of human nature, and the corresponding challenges to ethical discourse of the so-called ‘posthuman condition’. All t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2004
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture
Year: 2004, Volume: 9.2, Pages: 178-198 |
| Further subjects: | B
Biotechnology
B Peter Scott B Habermas B Fukuyama B Gregory Stock |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1835726836 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230215144954.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230215s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/ecot.9.2.178.38068 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1835726836 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1835726836 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1025030575 |0 (DE-627)720894085 |0 (DE-576)18547988X |4 aut |a Graham, Elaine L. |d 1959- | |
| 109 | |a Graham, Elaine L. 1959- |a Graham, Elaine 1959- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bioethics after Posthumanism |b Natural Law, Communicative Action and the Problem of Self-Design |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2004 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Three recent books by prominent social and political theorists (Francis Fukuyama, Gregory Stock and Jürgen Habermas) have engaged with the impact of biotechnology on our very concepts of human nature, and the corresponding challenges to ethical discourse of the so-called ‘posthuman condition’. All three writers raise important questions about the role of concepts of ‘human nature’ in moral discourse, and the paper will subject their claims to theological critique. I conclude by proposing, after Peter Scott (2003), that to consider humanity as ‘un/natural’ serves to affirm human interdependence with, rather than transcendence or dominion over, nature; but that similarly, talk of nature itself as ‘post/human’ restores to it a divinely-conferred integrity, liberated from the self-serving interests of technoscientific objectification. | ||
| 601 | |a communicare | ||
| 601 | |a Problem | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Fukuyama | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gregory Stock | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Habermas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peter Scott | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biotechnology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture |d London : Equinox Publ., 2007 |g 9.2(2004), Seite 178-198 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)549634886 |w (DE-600)2395657-4 |w (DE-576)274589745 |x 1749-4915 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9.2 |g year:2004 |g pages:178-198 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/ecot.9.2.178.38068 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.equinoxpub.com/JSRNC/article/view/5167 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 9.2 |j 2004 |h 178-198 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4272518828 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1835726836 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230215121721 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230215||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||