Religious pluralism and the ethics of healthcare
Democratic societies that separate church and state face major challenges in accommodating religious convictions. This applies especially to determining healthcare policies. Building on our prior work on the demands and limits of religious accommodation in democratic societies, we propose a set of e...
Auteurs: | ; |
---|---|
Collaborateurs: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2023
|
Dans: |
Bioethics
Année: 2023, Volume: 37, Numéro: 1, Pages: 42-51 |
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions NCD Éthique et politique NCH Éthique médicale |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Liberal Democracy
B religious objection B Medical Ethics B right to healthcare B vaccination mandates B Abortion |
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Democratic societies that separate church and state face major challenges in accommodating religious convictions. This applies especially to determining healthcare policies. Building on our prior work on the demands and limits of religious accommodation in democratic societies, we propose a set of ethical standards that can guide societies in meeting this challenge. In applying and defending these standards, we explore three topics: vaccine resistance, abortion, and concerns about rights to healthcare. We clarify these and other issues of religious accommodation and propose ethical standards for approaching these and other problems. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-8519 |
Référence: | Kritik in "Religious reasons, natural reasons and ‘exclusionism’: A commentary on Robert Audi and William Smith, ‘Religious Pluralism and the Ethics of Healthcare’ (2023)"
|
Contient: | Enthalten in: Bioethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13113 |