Oh, Sufferah Children of Jah: Unpacking the Rastafarian Rejection of Traditional Theodicies

The article maintains that the theological perspectives of RastafarI continue to be under-researched in the Caribbean context with perhaps more attention being paid to their contributions to the racial, musical and linguistic traditions of the region. In particular, Rasta theodicies are not as clear...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perkins, Anna Kasafi 1969- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2020
In: Open theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: 520-530
Further subjects:B RastafarI
B Theodicy
B Babylon
B Jamaica
B radical suffering
B corporate evil
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1830006401
003 DE-627
005 20221223131746.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221223s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/opth-2020-0134  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1830006401 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1830006401 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)14290208X  |0 (DE-627)640910823  |0 (DE-576)33398658X  |4 aut  |a Perkins, Anna Kasafi  |d 1969- 
109 |a Perkins, Anna Kasafi 1969-  |a Kasafi Perkins, Anna 1969- 
245 1 0 |a Oh, Sufferah Children of Jah  |b  Unpacking the Rastafarian Rejection of Traditional Theodicies 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The article maintains that the theological perspectives of RastafarI continue to be under-researched in the Caribbean context with perhaps more attention being paid to their contributions to the racial, musical and linguistic traditions of the region. In particular, Rasta theodicies are not as clearly articulated as other elements of its belief system even as it is recognised that RastafarI mansions and individual members do not hold homogenous beliefs about many things. The discussion takes as its starting point two prior reflections, "Just Desert or Just Deserts?: God and Suffering in these Perilous Days" (Perkins 2016) and "The Wages of (Sin) is Babylon: Rasta Versus Christian Religious Perspectives of Sin" (Perkins 2012); the former reflection highlights the insufficiency of traditional theodicy to answer the question: "if God is good, why does evil exist?" No one answer can sufficiently do justice to the many dimensions of the question. In that regard, Perkins (2016) argues for attention to the important "answer" that the radical suffering perspective offers to the discussion (Sarah Anderson Rajarigam (2004) too emphasises divine suffering or theopathos, as the response to radical suffering. She frames theopathos not just as an option within theodicy but as an alternative to theodicy, which she derides as "the spoilt child of enlightenment that self-destructively craves for theoretical and philosophical remedies for radical human suffering" (27).). Perkins (2012) explicates a particular Rasta understanding of sin and evil, which are important elements of any theodicy. For Rasta, sin is tri-dimensional - personal, inherited and corporate. Sin in its corporate or social dimension is the most salient as it is moral evil - a rejection of Jah’s will - which leads to the oppression of Jah’s people. 
650 4 |a Babylon 
650 4 |a Jamaica 
650 4 |a RastafarI 
650 4 |a corporate evil 
650 4 |a radical suffering 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Open theology  |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 2015  |g 6(2020), 1, Seite 520-530  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)862721644  |w (DE-600)2861119-6  |w (DE-576)473650002  |x 2300-6579  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:520-530 
856 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2020-0134/pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0134  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2020-0134/html  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 6  |j 2020  |e 1  |h 520-530 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4240943272 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1830006401 
LOK |0 005 20221223130550 
LOK |0 008 221223||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Babylon 
STB 0 0 |a Babylone 
STC 0 0 |a Babilonia 
STD 0 0 |a Babilonia 
STG 0 0 |a Babilônia 
STH 0 0 |a Вавилон (мотив) 
STI 0 0 |a Βαβυλώνα (μοτίβο) 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Babilu,Babylonie,Babylonia,Bābil,Babel,Babili