Territory, Relationship or Path: A Brief Survey in Metaphors of "Double Religious Belonging"

The discussion about "double" or "multiple belonging" does not take into account that there is no mandatory definition of religion. This paper explores some of the metaphors involved. "Belonging to a religion" implies a passive attitude and can signify "belonging t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Baatz, Ursula 1951- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: De Gruyter 2017
In: Open theology
Jahr: 2017, Band: 3, Heft: 1, Seiten: 144-155
weitere Schlagwörter:B Spirituality
B Territory
B Transformation
B Buddhism
B Zen Buddhism
B Identity Politics
B Relationship
B Religion
B intrareligious dialogue
B Christianity
B Interreligious Dialogue
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The discussion about "double" or "multiple belonging" does not take into account that there is no mandatory definition of religion. This paper explores some of the metaphors involved. "Belonging to a religion" implies a passive attitude and can signify "belonging to a mental or physical territory"; or it can signify "belonging to a group or person", i.e. it signifies a relationship. "Religion" is a Western concept, which cannot be translated e.g. into Sanskrit. One of the important Indian metaphors used is "path" or "way", which transports instead of a passive "belonging" the active notion of "owning it". "Belonging" could be seen in a context of identity politics, whereas "way" or "path" refers to the human need of spiritual transformation.
ISSN:2300-6579
Enthält:Enthalten in: Open theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/opth-2017-0011