Process-Panentheism and the "Only Way" Argument

Given panentheism, when trying to offer a plausible solution to the problem of evil, what is the most promising way forward? In this article, I argue that a panentheist who wants to answer the problem of evil by using the "only way" argument should embrace the metaphysics of process theism...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Langby, Lina (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: De Gruyter 2022
Dans: Open theology
Année: 2022, Volume: 8, Numéro: 1, Pages: 261-275
Sujets non-standardisés:B Évolution
B Evil
B Omnipotence
B Process Theism
B Theodicy
B process-panentheism
B Panentheism
B theistic evolution
B only way
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Given panentheism, when trying to offer a plausible solution to the problem of evil, what is the most promising way forward? In this article, I argue that a panentheist who wants to answer the problem of evil by using the "only way" argument should embrace the metaphysics of process theism. In other words, she ought to be a process-panentheist. Process theism is a version of panentheism, while panentheism generally need not to imply process theism. I shall use the terms "process-panentheist" and "non-process-panentheist" to differentiate adherents of these two forms of panentheism. I examine the "only way" argument as a possible theodicy for panentheists and conclude that it is only a convincing theodicy for the panentheist if (i) she is a process-panentheist, or (ii) she thinks this is the best possible world. If she is a non-process-panentheist or does not think this is the best possible world, the "only way" approach fails to be a coherent theodicy.
ISSN:2300-6579
Contient:Enthalten in: Open theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/opth-2022-0203