RELIGION IS EASY, BUT SCIENCE IS HARD … UNDERSTANDING McCAULEY'S THESIS: with James A. Van Slyke, “Religion Is Easy, but Science Is Hard … Understanding McCauley's Thesis”; Andrew Ali Aghapour, “Defining ‘Religion’ as Natural: A Critical Invitation to Robert McCauley”; Gregory R. Peterson, “On McCauley's Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not: Some Further Observations”; and Robert N. McCauley, “Explanatory Modesty.”
Robert N. McCauley's new book Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (2011) presents a new paradigm for investigating the relationship between science and religion by exploring the cognitive foundations of religious belief and scientific knowledge. McCauley's contention is that many of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2014
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2014, Volume: 49, Issue: 3, Pages: 696-707 |
| Further subjects: | B
Cognitive Science
B philosophy of science B Philosophy of religion B psychology of religion B cognitive science of religion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827965053 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220235157.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/zygo.12113 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827965053 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827965053 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)104447582X |0 (DE-627)772079196 |0 (DE-576)397687982 |4 aut |a Van Slyke, James A. |d 1972- | |
| 109 | |a Van Slyke, James A. 1972- |a Van Slyke, James 1972- |a Slyke, James A. van 1972- |a VanSlyke, James A. 1972- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a RELIGION IS EASY, BUT SCIENCE IS HARD … UNDERSTANDING McCAULEY'S THESIS: with James A. Van Slyke, “Religion Is Easy, but Science Is Hard … Understanding McCauley's Thesis”; Andrew Ali Aghapour, “Defining ‘Religion’ as Natural: A Critical Invitation to Robert McCauley”; Gregory R. Peterson, “On McCauley's Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not: Some Further Observations”; and Robert N. McCauley, “Explanatory Modesty.” |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Robert N. McCauley's new book Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (2011) presents a new paradigm for investigating the relationship between science and religion by exploring the cognitive foundations of religious belief and scientific knowledge. McCauley's contention is that many of the differences and disagreements regarding religion and science are the product of distinct features of human cognition that process these two domains of knowledge very differently. McCauley's thesis provides valuable insights into this relationship while not necessarily leading to a dismissive view of theology or religious belief. His paradigm allows the research lens to focus on cognitive differences in processing scientific versus religious information and the important role of automatic, unconscious, and intuitive cognitive processes in understanding both the natural and supernatural worlds. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a McCauley, Robert N. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a psychology of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive science of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cognitive Science | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966 |g 49(2014), 3, Seite 696-707 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:49 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g pages:696-707 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12113 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12113 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 49 |j 2014 |e 3 |h 696-707 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235369962 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827965053 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052628 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#75BCCD2BF7E30DFAD7C013C2402450805A7E4C60 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||