Barbour's Typologies and the Contemporary Debate on Islam and Science
Despite various criticisms, Ian Barbour's fourfold classification of the possible relationships between religion and science remains influential. I compare Barbour's taxonomy with the theories of four authors who, in the last four decades, have addressed the relationship between science an...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2012
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2012, Volume: 47, Issue: 3, Pages: 501-519 |
| Further subjects: | B
Ismail Raji al-Faruqi
B Integration B Islam and science B Mehdi Golshani B Seyyed Hossein Nasr B Nidhal Guessoum B Ian Barbour |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827963379 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052624.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01269.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827963379 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827963379 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bigliardi, Stefano |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Bigliardi, Stefano | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Barbour's Typologies and the Contemporary Debate on Islam and Science |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Despite various criticisms, Ian Barbour's fourfold classification of the possible relationships between religion and science remains influential. I compare Barbour's taxonomy with the theories of four authors who, in the last four decades, have addressed the relationship between science and religion from a Muslim perspective. The aim of my analysis is twofold. First, I offer a comparative perspective to the debate on science and Islam. Second, following Barbour's suggestion, I test the general applicability of his categories by comparing them with a discourse on science and religion that is not focused on Christianity. In the first section, I reconstruct Barbour's typologies, recalling some major objections to them, and arguing why despite the latter, Barbour's model is employed for the present analysis. I also reconstruct Barbour's parallel model for the relationships between different religions. In the second section, I reconstruct the discourse on science and religion developed by the Palestinian-American scholar Ismail Raji al-Faruqi. The third section is devoted to the ideas of the Persian-American scholar Seyyed Hossein Nasr. In the fourth section, I examine the views of the Iranian author Mehdi Golshani. The fifth section reconstructs the theories of the Algerian author Nidhal Guessoum. In the final section, I argue that a generalized use of the “integration” concept to refer to the entire debate on Islam and science is unhelpful. While these positions do not appear to instantiate Barbourian integration of science and religion, they do move toward what Barbour (skeptically) describes as integration between religions. | ||
| 601 | |a Typologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Seyyed Hossein Nasr | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Islam and science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Integration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nidhal Guessoum | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mehdi Golshani | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ian Barbour | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ismail Raji al-Faruqi | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966 |g 47(2012), 3, Seite 501-519 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2012 |g number:3 |g pages:501-519 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646969014 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01269.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01269.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 47 |j 2012 |e 3 |h 501-519 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235368281 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827963379 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052624 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#293099FD9359F0F2E16A6290A6A35870BE6E15EA | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Integration,Integration,Regional integration,Absorption |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Intégration,Intégration,Intégration |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Integración,Integración,Integración |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Integrazione,Integrazione civica <politica>,Integrazione,Integrazione (politica),Integrazione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 整合,整合,融合,集成,融合,集成 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 整合,区域整合,整合,融合,集成,融合,集成 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Integração,Integração,Integração regional,Integração |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Интеграция (мотив),Интеграция (политика),Интеграция |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενσωμάτωση <μοτίβο>,Ένταξη (πολιτική),Ενσωμάτωση,Ένταξη,Ένταξη (μοτίβο) |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Politische Integration,Internationale Integration,Regionale Integration |