How to Confuse Organisms with Mousetraps: Machine Metaphors and Intelligent Design
Abstract. Why do design arguments—particularly those emphasizing machine metaphors such as “Organisms and/or their parts are machines”—continue to be so convincing to so many people after they have been repeatedly refuted? In this essay I review various interpretations and refutations of design argu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2010
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2010, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 647-664 |
| Further subjects: | B
cognitive status of metaphors
B Intelligent design B Developmental Psychology B design arguments B agency and teleological bias B machine metaphors B dual process reasoning B Cognitive Psychology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827961929 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052622.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01119.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827961929 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827961929 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Recker, Doren |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How to Confuse Organisms with Mousetraps: Machine Metaphors and Intelligent Design |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract. Why do design arguments—particularly those emphasizing machine metaphors such as “Organisms and/or their parts are machines”—continue to be so convincing to so many people after they have been repeatedly refuted? In this essay I review various interpretations and refutations of design arguments and make a distinction between rationally refuting such arguments (RefutingR) and rendering them psychologically unconvincing (RefutingP). Expanding on this distinction, I provide support from recent work on the cognitive power of metaphors and developmental psychological work indicating a basic human propensity toward attributing agency to natural events, to show that design arguments “make sense”unless one is cued to look more closely. As with visual illusions, such as the Müller-Lyer arrow illusion, there is nothing wrong with a believer's cognitive apparatus any more than with their visual apparatus when they judge the lines in the illusion to be of unequal length. It takes training or a dissonance between design beliefs and other beliefs or experiences to play the role that a ruler does in the visual case. Unless people are cued to “look again” at what initially makes perfect sense, they are not inclined to apply more sophisticated evaluative procedures. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a machine metaphors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intelligent Design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dual process reasoning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Developmental Psychology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a design arguments | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive status of metaphors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cognitive Psychology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a agency and teleological bias | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966 |g 45(2010), 3, Seite 647-664 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2010 |g number:3 |g pages:647-664 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646911423 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01119.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01119.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 45 |j 2010 |e 3 |h 647-664 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235366831 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827961929 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052622 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#AA90E8F6B0E354E4A9692C4DB65878E4305180DA | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dessein intelligent |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Diseño inteligente |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Disegno intelligente |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Desenho inteligente |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Интеллегентный дизайн |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ευφυής σχεδιασμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh |