Maintaining Respectability: Response to Nicholaos Jones

Abstract. Nicholaos Jones argues that theology is not a respectable discipline because of its inability to meet the standards of contemporary science. Although Jones makes a bold claim, I suggest that he has not made his case by focusing on the question of defining science and metaphysics appropriat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peterson, Gregory R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2008
In: Zygon
Year: 2008, Volume: 43, Issue: 3, Pages: 593-598
Further subjects:B Philip Clayton
B Nancey Murphy
B Scientific Method
B Imre Lakatos
B Theological Method
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 182796023X
003 DE-627
005 20221220052619.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00941.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)182796023X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP182796023X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Peterson, Gregory R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Maintaining Respectability: Response to Nicholaos Jones 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract. Nicholaos Jones argues that theology is not a respectable discipline because of its inability to meet the standards of contemporary science. Although Jones makes a bold claim, I suggest that he has not made his case by focusing on the question of defining science and metaphysics appropriately, the analysis of the literature he cites, and his central claim that theology presupposes the absolute certainty of God. 
650 4 |a Theological Method 
650 4 |a Scientific Method 
650 4 |a Nancey Murphy 
650 4 |a Imre Lakatos 
650 4 |a Philip Clayton 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 43(2008), 3, Seite 593-598  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2008  |g number:3  |g pages:593-598 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)164664784X  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00941.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00941.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 43  |j 2008  |e 3  |h 593-598 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235365142 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 182796023X 
LOK |0 005 20221220052619 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#AA03B7E79B651C324B92D4BC414F98ED797AB2AE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL