Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones
Abstract. Four arguments are examined in order to assess the state of the Intelligent Design debate. First, critics continually cite the fact that ID proponents have religious motivations. When used as criticism of ID arguments, this is an obvious ad hominem. Nonetheless, philosophers and scientists...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2008
|
In: |
Zygon
Year: 2008, Volume: 43, Issue: 2, Pages: 433-449 |
Further subjects: | B
Conservatism
B Intelligent design B theory change B Dover trial B Methodological Naturalism |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|