Taking Science Seriously Without Scientism: A Response to Taede Smedes
Abstract. In responding to Taede Smedes, I first examine his thesis that the recent dialogue between science and religion has been dominated by scientism and does not take theology seriously. I then consider his views on divine action, free will and determinism, and process philosophy. Finally I use...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2008
|
Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2008, Volume: 43, Numéro: 1, Pages: 259-269 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Scientism
B Determinism B Process Philosophy B Divine Action B Alfred North Whitehead B Arthur Peacocke B Free Will B Logical Positivism B Karl Barth B John Polkinghorne B Creationism B linguistic philosophy B Taede Smedes |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
Résumé: | Abstract. In responding to Taede Smedes, I first examine his thesis that the recent dialogue between science and religion has been dominated by scientism and does not take theology seriously. I then consider his views on divine action, free will and determinism, and process philosophy. Finally I use the fourfold typology of Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration to discuss his proposal for the future of science and religion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00911.x |