Protecting God from Science and Technology: How Religious Criticisms of Biotechnologies Backfire

Many religious critics argue that biotechnology (such as cloning and genetic engineering) intrudes on God's domain, or plays God, or revolts against God. While some of these criticisms are standard complaints about human hubris, I argue that some of the recent criticism represents a “Promethean...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hopkins, Patrick D. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2002
In: Zygon
Year: 2002, Volume: 37, Issue: 2, Pages: 317-344
Further subjects:B Theology
B Religion and science
B God of the Gaps
B Biotechnology
B Genetic Engineering
B Religious Criticism
B Babel
B Cloning
B Prometheus
B religion and technology
B Hubris
B God
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827955287
003 DE-627
005 20221220052612.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/0591-2385.00431  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827955287 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827955287 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hopkins, Patrick D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Protecting God from Science and Technology: How Religious Criticisms of Biotechnologies Backfire 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Many religious critics argue that biotechnology (such as cloning and genetic engineering) intrudes on God's domain, or plays God, or revolts against God. While some of these criticisms are standard complaints about human hubris, I argue that some of the recent criticism represents a “Promethean” concern, in which believers unreflectively seem to fear that science and technology are actually replicating or stealing God's special deity–defining powers. These criticisms backfire theologically, because they diminish God, portraying God as an anthropomorphic superbeing whose relevance and special nature are increasingly rivaled by human power. 
601 |a Technologie 
601 |a Biotechnologie 
650 4 |a Theology 
650 4 |a Religious Criticism 
650 4 |a religion and technology 
650 4 |a Religion and science 
650 4 |a Prometheus 
650 4 |a Hubris 
650 4 |a God of the Gaps 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a Genetic Engineering 
650 4 |a Cloning 
650 4 |a Biotechnology 
650 4 |a Babel 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 37(2002), 2, Seite 317-344  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2002  |g number:2  |g pages:317-344 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00431  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0591-2385.00431  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 37  |j 2002  |e 2  |h 317-344 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235360191 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827955287 
LOK |0 005 20221220052612 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#D54BE93EBAAE9C4F1A3A2222CCE5156350E17EA4 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL