Protecting God from Science and Technology: How Religious Criticisms of Biotechnologies Backfire
Many religious critics argue that biotechnology (such as cloning and genetic engineering) intrudes on God's domain, or plays God, or revolts against God. While some of these criticisms are standard complaints about human hubris, I argue that some of the recent criticism represents a “Promethean...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2002
|
In: |
Zygon
Year: 2002, Volume: 37, Issue: 2, Pages: 317-344 |
Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Religion and science B God of the Gaps B Biotechnology B Genetic Engineering B Religious Criticism B Babel B Cloning B Prometheus B religion and technology B Hubris B God |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1827955287 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221220052612.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221220s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/0591-2385.00431 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1827955287 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827955287 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hopkins, Patrick D. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Protecting God from Science and Technology: How Religious Criticisms of Biotechnologies Backfire |
264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Many religious critics argue that biotechnology (such as cloning and genetic engineering) intrudes on God's domain, or plays God, or revolts against God. While some of these criticisms are standard complaints about human hubris, I argue that some of the recent criticism represents a “Promethean” concern, in which believers unreflectively seem to fear that science and technology are actually replicating or stealing God's special deity–defining powers. These criticisms backfire theologically, because they diminish God, portraying God as an anthropomorphic superbeing whose relevance and special nature are increasingly rivaled by human power. | ||
601 | |a Technologie | ||
601 | |a Biotechnologie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Criticism | |
650 | 4 | |a religion and technology | |
650 | 4 | |a Religion and science | |
650 | 4 | |a Prometheus | |
650 | 4 | |a Hubris | |
650 | 4 | |a God of the Gaps | |
650 | 4 | |a God | |
650 | 4 | |a Genetic Engineering | |
650 | 4 | |a Cloning | |
650 | 4 | |a Biotechnology | |
650 | 4 | |a Babel | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966 |g 37(2002), 2, Seite 317-344 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2002 |g number:2 |g pages:317-344 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00431 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0591-2385.00431 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 37 |j 2002 |e 2 |h 317-344 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4235360191 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1827955287 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221220052612 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#D54BE93EBAAE9C4F1A3A2222CCE5156350E17EA4 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |