Naturalism Need Not Be “Made Safe”: A Response to William Rottschaefer's Misunderstandings

In this article, I respond to William Rottschaefer's analysis of my writings on religion and science, especially my Religion, Science and Naturalism (1996). I show that I am not trying “to make naturalism safe,” as Rottschaefer contends, but rather attempting to explore options available when o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Drees, Willem B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2001
In: Zygon
Year: 2001, Volume: 36, Issue: 3, Pages: 455-465
Further subjects:B Empirical Theology
B Supernaturalism
B William Rottschaefer
B Naturalism
B limit questions
B Underdetermination
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827954736
003 DE-627
005 20221220052611.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/0591-2385.00372  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827954736 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827954736 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Drees, Willem B.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Naturalism Need Not Be “Made Safe”: A Response to William Rottschaefer's Misunderstandings 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article, I respond to William Rottschaefer's analysis of my writings on religion and science, especially my Religion, Science and Naturalism (1996). I show that I am not trying “to make naturalism safe,” as Rottschaefer contends, but rather attempting to explore options available when one endorses naturalistic approaches. I also explain why I object to the label “supernaturalistic naturalism” used by Rottschaefer. Possible limitations to naturalistic projects are discussed, not as limitations imposed but rather as features uncovered. 
601 |a Williams, A. N. 
601 |a Rottschaefer, William A. 
650 4 |a Underdetermination 
650 4 |a Supernaturalism 
650 4 |a William Rottschaefer 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a limit questions 
650 4 |a Empirical Theology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 36(2001), 3, Seite 455-465  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2001  |g number:3  |g pages:455-465 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/0591-2385.00372  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00372  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0591-2385.00372  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 36  |j 2001  |e 3  |h 455-465 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235359649 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827954736 
LOK |0 005 20221220052611 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#E3689AC0AAA165B1D45E2FAC9A79F006D8631EF4 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL