Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues
The ambivalent reputation of theology as an academic discipline is attributed to the often circular character of its procedures based on presumed authoritative sources. Recently, science too has come under the shadow of “postmodernist” critiques but, it is argued, has been able to withstand them suc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2000
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2000, Volume: 35, Issue: 1, Pages: 119-140 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Postmodernism B “bridge” model B Methodology B human environment B scientific realism B Rationality B Authority B inference to the best explanation (IBE) B critical issues (I–XIV) B Relativism B evolutionary epistemology B Dissonance B Reasonableness |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827953721 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220235118.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/0591-2385.00264 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827953721 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827953721 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)119317435 |0 (DE-627)080126073 |0 (DE-576)162503989 |4 aut |a Peacocke, Arthur R. |d 1924-2006 | |
| 109 | |a Peacocke, Arthur R. 1924-2006 |a Peacocke, Arthur Robert 1924-2006 |a Peacocke, A. R. 1924-2006 |a Peacocke, Arthur 1924-2006 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2000 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The ambivalent reputation of theology as an academic discipline is attributed to the often circular character of its procedures based on presumed authoritative sources. Recently, science too has come under the shadow of “postmodernist” critiques but, it is argued, has been able to withstand them successfully and make epistemologically warrantedclaims to be depicting reality—thereby vindicating human rationality. Evolutionary epistemological considerations also reinforce confidence in the more general deliverances of the human exploration of reasonableness through inference to the best explanation (IBE). The consequences of applying IBE, with its associated criteria, in theological investigation are considered in relation to theology as it is and as it might be. A number of issues critical for thedevelopment of a credible theology are identified. In spite of the challenging and somewhat negative view of contemporary theology to which this leads, hope is expressed that a genuinely credible “evangelical,”“catholic,” and liberal theology may yet emerge for the new millennium. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a scientific realism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Relativism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reasonableness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rationality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postmodernism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Methodology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a inference to the best explanation (IBE) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a human environment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a evolutionary epistemology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dissonance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical issues (I–XIV) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a “bridge” model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Authority | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966 |g 35(2000), 1, Seite 119-140 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2000 |g number:1 |g pages:119-140 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1642600660 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00264 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0591-2385.00264 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 35 |j 2000 |e 1 |h 119-140 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235358634 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827953721 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052609 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#C7AC27965194C8EB5B59C466693573F8D80CFAA8 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||