An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design
Rope Kojonen has presented a novel argument for design in biology by drawing on insights from evolutionary science. Without objecting to the explanatory role of evolution, he argues that there is further explanatory work to be done and that this is best achieved by an appeal to design. Here, I inter...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
| In: |
Zygon
Jahr: 2022, Band: 57, Heft: 4, Seiten: 1024-1036 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Design
B biological design argument B Evolution B theistic evolution B conjunctive explanation B Contingency |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1826761527 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230321122040.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221212s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/zygo.12842 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1826761527 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1826761527 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)106252991X |0 (DE-627)805378537 |0 (DE-576)419879218 |4 aut |a Glass, David H. | |
| 109 | |a Glass, David H. |a Glass, David Herbert | ||
| 245 | 1 | 3 | |a An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Rope Kojonen has presented a novel argument for design in biology by drawing on insights from evolutionary science. Without objecting to the explanatory role of evolution, he argues that there is further explanatory work to be done and that this is best achieved by an appeal to design. Here, I interpret his argument, and attempt to evaluate it, as a conjunctive explanation since he appeals to two explanations to account for the purposeful order and complexity of living organisms. Understood in this way, I argue that he makes a very plausible case that two explanations (evolution and design) are better than one (evolution). I also explore the role that direct guidance by God might play in such an argument. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a theistic evolution | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evolution | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contingency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a conjunctive explanation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a biological design argument | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966 |g 57(2022), 4, Seite 1024-1036 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g pages:1024-1036 |
| 856 | |u https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/files/116880675/Zygon_2022_Glass_AN_EVALUATION_OF_THE_BIOLOGICAL_CASE_FOR_DESIGN.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12842 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12842 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 57 |j 2022 |e 4 |h 1024-1036 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4228999905 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1826761527 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230130124018 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-11#4CCE4E40021A6B985D2EF3FB769B953A82A37890 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Evolution,Evolution |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Dessein,Dessein,Évolution,Évolution |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Deseño,Deseño,Evolución |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Evoluzione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 进化,演变 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 設計,進化,演變 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Desenho,Desenho,Evolução |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Дизайн,Эволюция |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Σχεδιασμός,Ντιζάιν,Εξέλιξη |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Abstammung , Formgebung,Eingetragenes Design |