Religion and Reason in American Politics

Whatever has been achieved in the recent debate regarding religion and politics in America, we have not yet clarified the proper place of religion in our public life. All parties endorse the terse formulation of the first amendment, "congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Gamwell, Franklin I. 1937- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Cambridge Univ. Press 1984
In: Journal of law and religion
Jahr: 1984, Band: 2, Heft: 2, Seiten: 325-342
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1826478663
003 DE-627
005 20221207172848.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221207s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/1051094  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826478663 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826478663 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)170252019  |0 (DE-627)060312602  |0 (DE-576)16794620X  |4 aut  |a Gamwell, Franklin I.  |d 1937- 
109 |a Gamwell, Franklin I. 1937- 
245 1 0 |a Religion and Reason in American Politics 
264 1 |c 1984 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Whatever has been achieved in the recent debate regarding religion and politics in America, we have not yet clarified the proper place of religion in our public life. All parties endorse the terse formulation of the first amendment, "congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," but there is persisting disagreement about the public philosophy which is there implied. Some fear a secularized state, that is, a state which is independent of all religious convictions, and insist that disestablishment does not preclude a foundation of religious values in the Republic. Others fear a state that is religiously partial and insist that the "wall of separation" prescribes civil neutrality toward religion as such. Each side asserts that the other misrepresents its position. The "religionists," as I will call them, deny that they seek to impose any particular religious conviction; the "separationists," as I will call them, deny that they are hostile to religion. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of law and religion  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983  |g 2(1984), 2, Seite 325-342  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)461908581  |w (DE-600)2164472-X  |w (DE-576)273875132  |x 2163-3088  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:2  |g year:1984  |g number:2  |g pages:325-342 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1051094  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/religion-and-reason-in-american-politics/175B9C59A319493C08C5BEA41318A095  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 2  |j 1984  |e 2  |h 325-342 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4228141110 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826478663 
LOK |0 005 20221207170556 
LOK |0 008 221207||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL