Levinas and Whitehead: Notes Toward a Conversation To Come

Alfred North Whitehead and Emmanuel Levinas are not often considered together in the contemporary philosophical literature. There are clearly sensible reasons for this. While Whitehead is a systematic thinker who explicitly engages in metaphysical philosophy within the tradition of process thought a...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Simmons, J. Aaron (Auteur) ; McDaniel, Jay (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: University of Illinois Press 2011
Dans: Process studies
Année: 2011, Volume: 40, Numéro: 1, Pages: 25-53
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Non-électronique
Description
Résumé:Alfred North Whitehead and Emmanuel Levinas are not often considered together in the contemporary philosophical literature. There are clearly sensible reasons for this. While Whitehead is a systematic thinker who explicitly engages in metaphysical philosophy within the tradition of process thought and who does not focus primarily on ethics, Levinas is resistant to systematic metaphysics and works within the phenomenohgical tradition in order to argue that ethics is first philosophy. Despite these significant points of contrast between Whitehead and Levinas, in this paper we argue that the two might stand as resourcesfor each other in various ways. Since this paper is meant to be explorative and suggestive rather than comprehensive and conclusive, we argue for just two possible points of resonance between these important philosophers: (1) Both Levinas and Whitehead develop an account of selfhood that is intrinsically relational and concerned with responsibility—we term this account "Ethical Subjectivity;" and (2) Both Levinas and Whitehead operate according to what we call a "Hermeneutics of the Other" that stresses epistemic humility and dialogical openness.
ISSN:2154-3682
Contient:Enthalten in: Process studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/44799116