Sociological Theory and Religious Truth

The accommodation between social science and religion of recent decades depended in part on the widespread conviction that there is no scientific basis for determining whether religious beliefs are true and whether religious practices are good. This conviction is based on dubious assumptions that ha...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, Benton (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 1977
In: Sociological analysis
Year: 1977, Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 368-388
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1823094538
003 DE-627
005 20221122052550.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221122s1977 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3710120  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1823094538 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1823094538 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Johnson, Benton  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sociological Theory and Religious Truth 
264 1 |c 1977 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The accommodation between social science and religion of recent decades depended in part on the widespread conviction that there is no scientific basis for determining whether religious beliefs are true and whether religious practices are good. This conviction is based on dubious assumptions that have blinded sociologists to the judgments concerning religious beliefs and practice that are implicit in their theories. Put simply, general theory has implied that although there is much in religion that is good, religious beliefs are not true. In recent years an increasing number of sociologists have become aware of these judgments. In particular, they have perceived that the negative judgment concerning religious truth jeopardizes the accommodation between social science and religion. Much of the newest theoretical work in the field is an effort to restore this accommodation by devising some way in which social science might affirm religious truth. Bellah's “symbolic realism,” Anthony and Robbins' search for religious “deep structures,” and Berger's search for “signals of transcendence” are reviewed. Whatever the scientific merits of these new approaches, the fact that they have clear implications for theology means they cannot form the basis for an accommodation between social science and religion that was as broad as the one which is now destroyed. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sociological analysis  |d Washington, DC, 1964  |g 38(1977), 4, Seite 368-388  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)522636381  |w (DE-600)2266083-5  |w (DE-576)263022102  |x 2325-7873  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:1977  |g number:4  |g pages:368-388 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3710120  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3710120  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article/38/4/368/1615978  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 38  |j 1977  |e 4  |h 368-388 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 421800322X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1823094538 
LOK |0 005 20221122052550 
LOK |0 008 221122||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-21#009D49836D65D51CE90F3D08C840FB98F3B98C69 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3710120 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL