Creaturely Solidarity

This essay examines several recent contributions to the growing literature on animal ethics from Christian perspectives. I categorize the four books under review in one of three ways depending on the scholars' methodological points of departure: (1) a reconstruction of the place of other animal...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kao, Grace Y. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2014
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Issue: 4, Pages: 743-768
Further subjects:B Justice
B Hospitality
B Rights
B Feminism
B Animals
B Welfare
B Stewardship
B Compassion
B Christianity
B Dominion
B Care
B Vegetarianism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822388708
003 DE-627
005 20221115052630.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jore.12080  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822388708 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822388708 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kao, Grace Y.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Creaturely Solidarity 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay examines several recent contributions to the growing literature on animal ethics from Christian perspectives. I categorize the four books under review in one of three ways depending on the scholars' methodological points of departure: (1) a reconstruction of the place of other animals in Christian history through a selective retrieval of texts and practices; (2) an identification of a key Christian ethical principle; and (3) a reconsideration of foundational doctrines of systematic theology. On the premise that social ethicists are interested in not only understanding the world, but also changing it, I observe that these authors have offered different answers to the following three questions: (1) whether the theoretical basis for reform is ultimately grounded upon notions of human sameness or difference with other animals; (2) whether scholar-activists should emphasize logic over passion or values over interests (or vice versa) in their calls for transformation; and (3) whether moral motivation for their targeted audiences is best served by reliance upon secular argumentation and interdisciplinary research or upon the distinctive claims of revelation and other tradition-specific norms. I conclude by offering my own thoughts about which approaches might prove more effective than others. 
650 4 |a Welfare 
650 4 |a Vegetarianism 
650 4 |a Stewardship 
650 4 |a Rights 
650 4 |a Hospitality 
650 4 |a Justice 
650 4 |a Feminism 
650 4 |a Dominion 
650 4 |a Compassion 
650 4 |a Christianity 
650 4 |a Care 
650 4 |a Animals 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 42(2014), 4, Seite 743-768  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2014  |g number:4  |g pages:743-768 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586121  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12080  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12080  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 42  |j 2014  |e 4  |h 743-768 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211032089 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822388708 
LOK |0 005 20221115052630 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#F84FDF75A2CB825495552D6CD5703B557CF8CAA8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586121 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Care,Dominion 
STB 0 0 |a Care,Sollicitude,Sollicitude,Dominion 
STC 0 0 |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado,Dominio 
STD 0 0 |a Care,Dominion 
STG 0 0 |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado,Domínio 
STH 0 0 |a Доминион,Этика заботы 
STI 0 0 |a Care (ηθική),Ντομίνιον,Dominion 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Commonwealth country,Commonwealth realm