Stout, Rawls, and the Idea of Public Reason

Jeffrey Stout claims that John Rawls's idea of public reason (IPR) has contributed to a Christian backlash against liberalism. This essay argues that those whom Stout calls “antiliberal traditionalists” have misunderstood Rawls in important ways, and goes on to consider Stout's own critiqu...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Ryan, Phil (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell 2014
Dans: Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2014, Volume: 42, Numéro: 3, Pages: 540-562
Sujets non-standardisés:B John Rawls
B Stanley Hauerwas
B Jeffrey Stout
B idea of public reason
B Liberalism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Électronique

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822388600
003 DE-627
005 20221115052630.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jore.12069  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822388600 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822388600 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ryan, Phil  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Stout, Rawls, and the Idea of Public Reason 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Jeffrey Stout claims that John Rawls's idea of public reason (IPR) has contributed to a Christian backlash against liberalism. This essay argues that those whom Stout calls “antiliberal traditionalists” have misunderstood Rawls in important ways, and goes on to consider Stout's own critiques of the IPR. While Rawls's idea is often interpreted as a blanket prohibition on religious reasoning outside church and home, the essay will show that the very viability of the IPR depends upon a rich culture of deliberation in which all forms of reasoning can be put forth for consideration. This clarification addresses the perception that the IPR imposes an “asymmetrical burden” upon believers. In fact, the essay suggests that there are good reasons why believers, qua believers, might endorse the IPR. 
650 4 |a Liberalism 
650 4 |a Stanley Hauerwas 
650 4 |a idea of public reason 
650 4 |a Jeffrey Stout 
650 4 |a John Rawls 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 42(2014), 3, Seite 540-562  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:540-562 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1647206030  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586069  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12069  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12069  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 42  |j 2014  |e 3  |h 540-562 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211031988 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822388600 
LOK |0 005 20221115052630 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#5810B2C99589E87142E72C9ED1953386C0288635 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586069 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL