Stout, Rawls, and the Idea of Public Reason
Jeffrey Stout claims that John Rawls's idea of public reason (IPR) has contributed to a Christian backlash against liberalism. This essay argues that those whom Stout calls “antiliberal traditionalists” have misunderstood Rawls in important ways, and goes on to consider Stout's own critiqu...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2014
|
Dans: |
Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2014, Volume: 42, Numéro: 3, Pages: 540-562 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
John Rawls
B Stanley Hauerwas B Jeffrey Stout B idea of public reason B Liberalism |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1822388600 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115052630.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12069 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1822388600 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822388600 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ryan, Phil |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Stout, Rawls, and the Idea of Public Reason |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Jeffrey Stout claims that John Rawls's idea of public reason (IPR) has contributed to a Christian backlash against liberalism. This essay argues that those whom Stout calls “antiliberal traditionalists” have misunderstood Rawls in important ways, and goes on to consider Stout's own critiques of the IPR. While Rawls's idea is often interpreted as a blanket prohibition on religious reasoning outside church and home, the essay will show that the very viability of the IPR depends upon a rich culture of deliberation in which all forms of reasoning can be put forth for consideration. This clarification addresses the perception that the IPR imposes an “asymmetrical burden” upon believers. In fact, the essay suggests that there are good reasons why believers, qua believers, might endorse the IPR. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Liberalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Stanley Hauerwas | |
650 | 4 | |a idea of public reason | |
650 | 4 | |a Jeffrey Stout | |
650 | 4 | |a John Rawls | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 42(2014), 3, Seite 540-562 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g pages:540-562 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1647206030 |k Electronic | ||
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586069 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12069 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12069 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 42 |j 2014 |e 3 |h 540-562 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211031988 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1822388600 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115052630 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#5810B2C99589E87142E72C9ED1953386C0288635 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586069 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |