EUDAIMONIA AND AGAPE IN MACINTYRE AND KIERKEGAARD'S WORKS OF LOVE

This essay explores connections and divergences between Alasdair MacIntyre's eudaimonistic ethic and Søren Kierkegaard's agapeistic ethic—perhaps the greatest proponents of these ethical paradigms from the past two centuries. The purpose of the work is threefold. First, to demonstrate an i...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mendham, Matthew D. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2007
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 35, Issue: 4, Pages: 591-625
Further subjects:B Agape
B Alasdair MacIntyre
B Duty
B Love
B Kierkegaard
B Self-interest
B Eudaimonia
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822386160
003 DE-627
005 20221115052626.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00323.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822386160 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822386160 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mendham, Matthew D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a EUDAIMONIA AND AGAPE IN MACINTYRE AND KIERKEGAARD'S WORKS OF LOVE 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay explores connections and divergences between Alasdair MacIntyre's eudaimonistic ethic and Søren Kierkegaard's agapeistic ethic—perhaps the greatest proponents of these ethical paradigms from the past two centuries. The purpose of the work is threefold. First, to demonstrate an impressive amount of convergence and complementarity in their approaches to the transcendent grounds of an ethic of flourishing, the rigors necessary for a proper self-love, and the other-directed nature of proper social relations. Second, given the inapplicability of common dichotomies, to pinpoint more precisely where Kierkegaard departs from eudaimonism, and where MacIntyre departs from agapeism. Finally, to show that both Kierkegaard's and MacIntyre's grounds for departure are inadequate, and thus that the most central insights of eudaimonist and agapeist ethics can be harmonized to a greater extent than either Kierkegaard's or MacIntyre's framework can allow. 
650 4 |a Duty 
650 4 |a Love 
650 4 |a Agape 
650 4 |a Self-interest 
650 4 |a Eudaimonia 
650 4 |a Alasdair MacIntyre 
650 4 |a Kierkegaard 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 35(2007), 4, Seite 591-625  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2007  |g number:4  |g pages:591-625 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018022  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00323.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00323.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 35  |j 2007  |e 4  |h 591-625 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211029541 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822386160 
LOK |0 005 20221115052626 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#15966A4AACC3EC85040DF156ECD0C3BE6A2AFC9A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018022 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Agape 
STB 0 0 |a Agapes 
STC 0 0 |a Ágape 
STD 0 0 |a Agape 
STE 0 0 |a 爱,神圣的爱,爱德 
STF 0 0 |a 愛,神聖的愛,愛德 
STG 0 0 |a Ágape 
STH 0 0 |a Агапэ (греческий яз.) 
STI 0 0 |a Αγάπη 
SUB |a REL