ON MEDICINE, CULTURE, AND CHILDREN'S BASIC INTERESTS: A REPLY TO THREE CRITICS

Margaret Mohrmann, Paul Lauritzen, and Sumner Twiss raise questions about my account of basic interests, liberal theory, and the challenges of multiculturalism as developed in Children, Ethics, and Modern Medicine. Their questions point to foundational issues regarding the justification and limitati...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miller, Richard B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2006
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2006, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 177-189
Further subjects:B Multiculturalism
B Justice
B Intervention
B basic interests
B Respect
B Beneficence
B pediatric paradigm
B Care
B Rights
B Paternalism
B Children
B Autonomy
B Rawls
B Liberalism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822385709
003 DE-627
005 20221115052626.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00259.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822385709 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822385709 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Miller, Richard B.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a ON MEDICINE, CULTURE, AND CHILDREN'S BASIC INTERESTS: A REPLY TO THREE CRITICS 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Margaret Mohrmann, Paul Lauritzen, and Sumner Twiss raise questions about my account of basic interests, liberal theory, and the challenges of multiculturalism as developed in Children, Ethics, and Modern Medicine. Their questions point to foundational issues regarding the justification and limitation of parental authority to make decisions on behalf of children in medical and other contexts. One of the central questions in that regard is whether adults' decisions deserve to be respected, especially when they seem contrary to a child's or adolescent's basic interests. Questions about respect, in turn, focus attention on others' decisions about what seems good for families and children, decisions that may be paternalistic or utilitarian. Such decisions are further complicated by a child's or adolescent's budding autonomy and need for respect and recognition. Pediatric bioethics grounded in an account of a child's basic interests produces a theory of negative and positive rights for assessing adults' actions in relation to children, especially (but not only) when adults demand respect in their expressions of care. 
650 4 |a Rights 
650 4 |a Respect 
650 4 |a Rawls 
650 4 |a pediatric paradigm 
650 4 |a Paternalism 
650 4 |a Multiculturalism 
650 4 |a Liberalism 
650 4 |a Justice 
650 4 |a Intervention 
650 4 |a Children 
650 4 |a Care 
650 4 |a Beneficence 
650 4 |a basic interests 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 34(2006), 1, Seite 177-189  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2006  |g number:1  |g pages:177-189 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1536655457  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018186  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00259.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00259.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 34  |j 2006  |e 1  |h 177-189 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211029088 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822385709 
LOK |0 005 20221115052626 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#A90411867A8BF085C532852CB9E08D95D835991A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018186 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Care,Intervention,Intervention,Interference 
STB 0 0 |a Care,Sollicitude,Sollicitude,Intervention,Intervention 
STC 0 0 |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado,Intervención,Intervención 
STD 0 0 |a Care,Intervento,Intervento 
STE 0 0 |a 干涉,干预,介入 
STF 0 0 |a 干涉,干預,介入 
STG 0 0 |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado,Intervenção,Intervenção 
STH 0 0 |a Интервенция (международное право),Интервенция,Этика заботы 
STI 0 0 |a Care (ηθική),Παρέμβαση (Διεθνές δίκαιο),Παρέμβαση 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Krieg - Kriegsarten - Intervention,Dringliche Intervention,Therapeutischer Eingriff,Prophylaktischer Eingriff,Einmischung,Einmischung in die inneren Angelegenheiten