WHOSE INTERESTS ARE THEY, ANYWAY?
This review both praises Richard Miller's book—a thoughtful, judicious, and comprehensive analysis of bioethics for the pediatric age group, notably the first effort worthy of the name—and points out the work still to be done in this area, work firmly based in and illuminated by Miller's g...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2006
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2006, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 141-150 |
| Further subjects: | B
basic interests
B Paternalism B best interests B Parents B Beneficence B Bioethics B Autonomy B Children B Richard Miller |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1822385679 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221115052626.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221115s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00260.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1822385679 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822385679 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mohrmann, Margaret E. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a WHOSE INTERESTS ARE THEY, ANYWAY? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This review both praises Richard Miller's book—a thoughtful, judicious, and comprehensive analysis of bioethics for the pediatric age group, notably the first effort worthy of the name—and points out the work still to be done in this area, work firmly based in and illuminated by Miller's ground-breaking thesis. Specifically, the book rightly compels us to recognize obligations of beneficence as primary and to refocus on the child's basic interests, rather than putative “best” interests. There remains much to be done in defining and discerning basic interests and in distinguishing whose interests are on the table when decisions are being made for seriously ill and dying children. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a basic interests | |
| 650 | 4 | |a best interests | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Paternalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Beneficence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Parents | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Children | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Richard Miller | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 34(2006), 1, Seite 141-150 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2006 |g number:1 |g pages:141-150 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018183 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00260.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00260.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 34 |j 2006 |e 1 |h 141-150 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4211029053 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1822385679 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221115052626 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#AE0CAAE06A7EC52B6171B0F5F111D2FB9F90176B | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018183 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||