Reasonably Traditional: Self–Contradiction and Self–Reference in Alasdair MacIntyre’s Account of Tradition–Based Rationality

Alasdair MacIntyre’s account of tradition–based rationality has been the subject of much discussion, as well as the object of some recent charges of inconsistency. The author considers arguments by Jennifer Herdt, Peter Mehl, and John Haldane which attempt to show that MacIntyre’s account of rationa...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Lott, Micah (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell 2002
Dans: Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2002, Volume: 30, Numéro: 3, Pages: 315-339
Sujets non-standardisés:B self–reference
B tradition–based rationality
B Relativism
B Justification
B MacIntyre
Accès en ligne: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822384699
003 DE-627
005 20221115052624.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1467-9795.00111  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822384699 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822384699 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lott, Micah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Lott, Micah  |a Lott, Micah E.  |a Lott, Micah Elisa 
245 1 0 |a Reasonably Traditional: Self–Contradiction and Self–Reference in Alasdair MacIntyre’s Account of Tradition–Based Rationality 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Alasdair MacIntyre’s account of tradition–based rationality has been the subject of much discussion, as well as the object of some recent charges of inconsistency. The author considers arguments by Jennifer Herdt, Peter Mehl, and John Haldane which attempt to show that MacIntyre’s account of rationality is, in some way, inconsistent. It is argued that the various charges of inconsistency brought against MacIntyre by these critics can be understood as variations on two general types of criticism: (1) that MacIntyre’s account of tradition–based rationality presents a picture of rationality with inconsistent internal elements, and (2) that MacIntyre, in the act of presenting his picture of rationality, makes the sort of claims to which his own account of rationality denies legitimacy, and thus MacIntyre’s account is self–referentially incoherent. In response to criticisms of the first sort, it is argued that MacIntyre can further clarify or develop his position to take the current criticisms into account without altering the fundamental aspects of his picture of rationality. In response to the charge of self–referential incoherence, it is argued that the charge rests on a mistaken understanding of MacIntyre’s position and of the nature of justification. In dealing with these arguments, the author hopes to not only vindicate MacIntyre’s account of rationality against the charges of some of its recent critics, but also to shed some light on the nature of arguments both for and against relativism and historicism. 
601 |a MacIntyre, Alasdair C. 
650 4 |a Justification 
650 4 |a self–reference 
650 4 |a Relativism 
650 4 |a MacIntyre 
650 4 |a tradition–based rationality 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 30(2002), 3, Seite 315-339  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2002  |g number:3  |g pages:315-339 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018087  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9795.00111  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9795.00111  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 30  |j 2002  |e 3  |h 315-339 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211028073 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822384699 
LOK |0 005 20221115052624 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#92C9B7ACD422343F5494FE269F5E0DC50F4D0C55 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018087 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL