A Conversation Worth Having: Hauerwas and Gustafson on Substance in Theological Ethics

When a debate is misplaced, new problems are cast in the distorting language of the settled problems of the past while, at the same time, the participants in the debate are assimilated into communities of thought with which they have little in common. The result is that their work, and our response...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reynolds, Terrence P. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2000
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2000, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 395-421
Further subjects:B Gustafson
B Pragmatism
B warranted belief
B Polemics
B Hauerwas
B Historicism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822384206
003 DE-627
005 20221115052623.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/0384-9694.00055  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822384206 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822384206 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Reynolds, Terrence P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Conversation Worth Having: Hauerwas and Gustafson on Substance in Theological Ethics 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a When a debate is misplaced, new problems are cast in the distorting language of the settled problems of the past while, at the same time, the participants in the debate are assimilated into communities of thought with which they have little in common. The result is that their work, and our response to it, is distorted. This article contends that the polemical debate between James Gustafson (and his followers) and Stanley Hauerwas (and his followers) is just such a misplaced debate. In fact, both can be shown to be Troeltschianhistoricists, and it is only when this commonality is recognized that their very real and deep differences can be rightly appreciated as emblematic of the true sources of disagreement at the growing edge of the discipline. 
601 |a Conversano 
601 |a Theologe 
650 4 |a warranted belief 
650 4 |a Pragmatism 
650 4 |a Polemics 
650 4 |a Historicism 
650 4 |a Hauerwas 
650 4 |a Gustafson 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 28(2000), 3, Seite 395-421  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2000  |g number:3  |g pages:395-421 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1642690589  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017863  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0384-9694.00055  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0384-9694.00055  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 28  |j 2000  |e 3  |h 395-421 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211027581 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822384206 
LOK |0 005 20221115052623 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#523853ACE6E7DEEC270728BEDE3159E3B85096BC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017863 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL