Levinas and the Euthanasia Debate

The philosophers' tendency to characterize euthanasia interms of either the right or the responsibility to die is, in some ways, problematic. Stepping outside of the analytic framework, the author draws out the implications of the ethics of Emmanuel Levinas for the euthanasia debate, tracing th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nuyen, A. T. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2000
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2000, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 119-135
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Levinas
B Death
B Dying
B Suicide
B Responsibility
B Euthanasia
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822384060
003 DE-627
005 20221115052623.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/0384-9694.00038  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822384060 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822384060 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Nuyen, A. T.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Nuyen, A. T.  |a Tuan Nuyen, A. 
245 1 0 |a Levinas and the Euthanasia Debate 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The philosophers' tendency to characterize euthanasia interms of either the right or the responsibility to die is, in some ways, problematic. Stepping outside of the analytic framework, the author draws out the implications of the ethics of Emmanuel Levinas for the euthanasia debate, tracing the way Levinas's position differs not only from the philosophical consensus but also from the theological one. The article shows that, according to Levinas, there is no ethical case for suicide or assisted suicide. Death cannot be assumed or chosen—not only because suicide is a logically and metaphysically contradictory concept but also because in the choice of death ethical responsibility turns into irresponsibility. However, since Levinas holds that one must be responsible to the point of expiation, he can be said to approve certain actions that may have the consequence of hastening death. 
650 4 |a Suicide 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a Levinas 
650 4 |a Euthanasia 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Dying 
650 4 |a Death 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 28(2000), 1, Seite 119-135  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2000  |g number:1  |g pages:119-135 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)596809913  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015279  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0384-9694.00038  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0384-9694.00038  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 28  |j 2000  |e 1  |h 119-135 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211027441 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822384060 
LOK |0 005 20221115052623 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#0DC62DFF5F2B5586806DF04C866325794A90E13C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015279 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL