The Structure of Max Weber's Ethic of Responsibility

Max Weber's distinction in “Politics as a Vocation” between the ethic of conviction and the ethic of responsibility is best understood as a distinction between mutually exclusive ethical worldviews. Interpretations that correlate the two ethics with Weber's distinction between value-ration...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Starr, Bradley E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 1999
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 1999, Volume: 27, Issue: 3, Pages: 407-434
Further subjects:B Max Weber
B Conflict
B ethic of responsibility
B Values
B Political ethics
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822383951
003 DE-627
005 20221115052623.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/0384-9694.00025  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822383951 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822383951 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Starr, Bradley E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Structure of Max Weber's Ethic of Responsibility 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Max Weber's distinction in “Politics as a Vocation” between the ethic of conviction and the ethic of responsibility is best understood as a distinction between mutually exclusive ethical worldviews. Interpretations that correlate the two ethics with Weber's distinction between value-rational social action and instrumental-rational social action are misleading since Weber assumes that both types of rational social action are present in both ethics. The ethic of conviction recognizes a given hierarchy of values as the context for moral endeavor. The ethic of responsibility acknowledges value obligations, but assumes the absence of any given hierarchy of values and the inevitability of value conflict as the context for moral endeavor. When interpreted in the context of his multilayered understanding of value conflict, Weber's ethic of responsibility emerges as a coherent ethical perspective. 
601 |a Weber, Max 
650 4 |a Max Weber 
650 4 |a Values 
650 4 |a Political ethics 
650 4 |a ethic of responsibility 
650 4 |a Conflict 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 27(1999), 3, Seite 407-434  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:1999  |g number:3  |g pages:407-434 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)596809867  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015266  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0384-9694.00025  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0384-9694.00025  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 27  |j 1999  |e 3  |h 407-434 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211027336 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822383951 
LOK |0 005 20221115052623 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#2A4DC3B7BEFF343C928D57F16E7FD98C11F5CCB8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015266 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL